• +91-9555269393
  • info@ijdssh.com

International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities

(By Aryavart International University, India)

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN:2455-5142 | P-ISSN:2455-7730
Impact Factor(2021): 6.013 | Impact Factor(2022): 6.725

IJDSSH
Typically replies within an hour

IJDSSH
Hi there

How can I help you?
Chat with Us

Paper Details

A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF INTENTIONALITY STANDARD IN JOE BIDEN’S INAUGURAL SPEECH

Vol. 10, Jul-Dec 2020 | Page: 120-126

Abdullah Najim Abd Al Khanaifsawy
The General Directorate of Education at Diwaniyah, Ministry of Education, Iraq

Received: 06-08-2020, Accepted: 15-09-2020, Published Online: 17-10-2020


. Download Full Paper

Abstract

Language, as a tool of communication, is one of the main features that distinguishes human beings from other creatures. To use this feature cooperatively in communication, people have to produce texts (written or spoken) that meet the seven standards of textuality which are “cohesion, coherence, intentionality, acceptability, informativity, situationality and intertextuality”. This study investigates how Biden regards intentionality standard in his inaugural speech. It aims to show how the president pays his attention to make his text cohesive and coherent and how he employs and observes the notion of speech acts and conversational maxims. The study concludes that Biden paid his attention to make his text communicative by regarding intentionality standard. He produces text that has cohesion and coherence property with employing to speech acts notion and observing for the four conversational maxims. Wish you buy UK cheap rolex replica watches from the discounted website. They are suitable for both men and women.
If you like forever classic fake watches, you cannot miss the best replica breitling watches UK.
Best UK fake watches online are worth having.

Reference
  1. Alexieva, 1997. ‘A Typology of Interpreter-Mediated Events’. The Translator. Vol.3, 2: 153-174. St. Jerome Publishing
  2. Beaugrande, R. de and Dressler, W. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics.
  3. Beaugrande, R. de. & W. U. Dressler. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London, New York: Longman. 1992.
  4. Beaugrande, R. de. & W. U. Dressler. Text linguistics. In: Verschueren, J. ea. (eds.) 1995. Handbook of Pragmatics, Manual. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 536-544.
  5. Chilton, P. A. & Schaffner, C. (2002). Politics as Text and Talk Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  6. Crystal, D (2005). How Language Works. England. Penguin Books.
  7. Fairclough, N (2000). New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.
  8. Halliday, M.A.K (1985). Language as Social Semiotics. London: Edward Arnold.
  9. Hatim, B &Mason, I (1997). The Translator as Communicator. London: Routledge.
  10. Longman Neubert, A &Shreve, G (1992). Translation as Text. Kent: Kent State University Press.
  11. Smith, S. C (2009). Modes of Discourse: The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Widdowson, H. G (2007). Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Wodak, R., & Kendall, G. (2007). What is critical discourse analysis? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 8(2), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfilologia.11.5041
  14. Wodak, R., & Kendall, G. (2007). What is critical discourse analysis? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 8(2), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfilologia.11.5041