• +91-9555269393
  • info@ijdssh.com

International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities

(By Aryavart International University, India)

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN:2455-5142 | P-ISSN:2455-7730
Impact Factor(2020): 5.790 | Impact Factor(2021): 6.013
Search

IJDSSH
Typically replies within an hour

IJDSSH
Hi there

How can I help you?
Chat with Us

Paper Details

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Political Speech on Online Education

Vol. 15, Jan-Jun 2023 | Page: 68-78

Dr. Bushra Ni'ma Rashid
College of Education, Ibn Rushd for Human Sciences, The Department of English, Iraq

Received: 02-01-2023, Accepted: 05-02-2023, Published Online: 18-06-2023


. Download Full Paper

Abstract

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a method that is very context-sensitive, democratic, and takes an ethical perspective on social problems to change society. CDA examines the connections between language and the social and political settings in which it is utilized. This study aims to examine the true objective and purpose of political speeches on online education. It investigates political discourse about online education. A CDA of political speech from online education is used in the present study, which is text qualitative research. Understanding and analyzing this communication was made easier by using this approach. We compile a dataset that includes academic settings, and the dataset is preprocessing using stop word removal, stemming, and dimensionality reduction, and then conduct statistical analysis using ANOVA. The findings may be useful for researchers doing more CDA research. The suggested system's effectiveness is assessed using accuracy and computation times are compared with conventional methodologies to prove the efficiency of the system.

Reference
  1. Anderson, K.T. and Holloway, J., 2020. Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), pp.188-221.
  2. Ibtihal, M. Al-Tameemi and Farhan, M. A. (2018). Identifying the Pragmatic Meaning of Reduplication in Some. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334947758_Identifying_the_Pragmatic_Meaning_of_Reduplication_in_Some
  3. Halliwell, S.D., du Plessis, C., Hickey, A., Gildersleeve, J., Mullens, A.B., Sanders, T., Clark, K.A., Hughto, J.M., Debattista, J., Phillips, T.M. and Daken, K., 2022. A Critical Discourse Analysis of an Australian Incarcerated Trans Woman's Letters of Complaint and Self‐Advocacy. Ethos.
  4. Jacobs, T. and Tschötschel, R., 2019. Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(5), pp.469-485.
  5. Munro, M., 2018. The complicity of digital technologies in the marketisation of UK higher education: exploring the implications of a critical discourse analysis of thirteen national digital teaching and learning strategies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), pp.1-20.
  6. Barnhart, T. and van Es, E.A., 2020. Developing a critical discourse about teaching and learning: The case of a secondary science video club. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(5), pp.491-514.
  7. Mullet, D.R., 2018. A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), pp.116-142.
  8. Montejo, G.M. and Adriano, T.Q., 2018. A critical discourse analysis of headlines in online news portals. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), pp.70-83.
  9. Rababah, A.G. and Hamdan, J.M., 2019. A Contrastive Critical Discourse Analysis of Netanyahu's and Abbas's Speeches on the Gaza War (2014). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), p.178.
  10. Robles, J.S., 2020. Critical Theory and Linguistics. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, pp.1-8.
  11. Sengul, K., 2019. Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: a case study of right-wing populist discourse in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), pp.376-392.
  12. Bouvier, G. and Machin, D., 2018. Critical discourse analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media. Review of communication, 18(3), pp.178-192.
  13. Aazam, F., Baig, F.Z., Baig, T., Khaliq, S., Azam, A., Shamshad, S. and Aslam, M.Z., 2019. A Critical Discourse Analysis of ‘Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House’by Michael Wolff. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), pp.192-199.
  14. Medriano Jr, R.S. and De Vera, P.V., 2020. Dominance Construction in Monologic Political Discourse Based on Selected Public Speeches of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte. Online Submission.
  15. Jegede, O.O., 2020. Syntactic analysis of Donald Trump’s inaugural speech. Studies in Literature and Language, 21(1), pp.93-98.
  16. Guswita, K.A., 2020. Transitivity analysis of Jokowi and Prabowo campaign speech in Indonesian presidential election. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1), pp.143-158.
  17. Irawan, D., 2020. Semantic Analysis of the Meaning Sontoloyo politician In the Mr. Joko widodo Speech. Faktor: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), pp.33-36.