• +91-9555269393
  • info@ijdssh.com

International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities

(By Aryavart International University, India)

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN:2455-5142 | P-ISSN:2455-7730
Impact Factor(2021): 6.013 | Impact Factor(2022): 6.725
Search

IJDSSH
Typically replies within an hour

IJDSSH
Hi there

How can I help you?
Chat with Us

Paper Details

The Use of Oxymoron in English and its Significance for Teaching Iraqi EFL Universities Students

Vol. 16, Jul-Dec 2023 | Page: 1-7

Hayder Hakim Abd Al-Khadhim
Department of English Language, College of Education, Sawa University, Almuthana, Iraq

Received: 02-06-2023, Accepted: 10-08-2023, Published Online: 16-08-2023


. Download Full Paper

Abstract

Oxymoron in English is a linguistic phenomenon of special importance. This phenomenon appeared in the language for a long time, but it developed strongly from the end of the 15th century. This is a fairly common phenomenon and appears a lot in the language. It is very important to study oxymoron in English and its implications for teaching students majoring in English. Research results will help students better understand English sentence structure and word usage, and help develop creative thinking and flexibility in using language. The research also familiarizes language majors with different rhetorical devices and expressions, strengthen their writing and speaking skills, create an interesting learning environment, raise students' curiosity and interest, and help them absorb knowledge in a positive way. In this article, the author will focus on clarifying oxymoron in English and its application in teaching. To have a solid basis, the author will conduct a survey and evaluate learners to understand its advantages and limitations.

Reference
  1. Abd Al Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2019). A SOCIO-PRAGMATIC STUDY OF OFFER STRATEGIES MANIPULATED BY IRAQI DIALECT SPEAKERS. The Islamic college university journal, (51).‏\
  2. Al Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2017). A STYLISTIC STUDY OF EUPHEMISM IN JOHN DONNE’S SELECTED POEMS. The Islamic University College Journal, 35-38.
  3. Al Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2022). A PRAGMATIC STUDY OF PRESUPPOSITION IN IMAM ALI’S SOME SELECTED TRANSLATED SAYINGS IN ‘NAHJUL BALAGHA’, Eastern Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literatures (EJLLL). Vol.3, No.4.
  4. Al-Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2016). Investigating Iraqi EFL learners’ use of the speech act of agreement. Adab Al-Kufa,1(27), 11-30.
  5. Al-Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2019). DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S SPEECH AT THE ISLAM CENTRE IN WASHINGTON. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol. No. 9, Issue No. III, Jul-Sep.
  6. Al-Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2020). A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF INTENTIONALITY STANDARD IN JOE BIDEN’S INAUGURAL SPEECH. International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10.‏
  7. Al-Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2021). A Pragma-Dialectical Study of David Hare’s ‘Stuff Happens. . Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol.2, 136-186.
  8. Al-Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2021). A Stylistic Study of Compliment Speech Act in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. International Journal of Advancement in Social Science and Humanity. Vol.12.
  9. Ameringer, T. E. (1921). The stylistic influence of the Second Sophistic on the panegyrical sermons of St. John Chrysostom: a study in Greek rhetoric. Catholic University of America.
  10. Babayev, J. (2021). Stylistic devices based on contradiction. In world science: Problems and innovations (pp. 162164).
  11. Bageshwar, B. R. (2021). A Study of Literary Devices used in the Posts on Instagram. Doi: 10.22161/ijels.61.54
  12. Bailey, D., & Koney, K. M. (1996). Interorganizational community-based collaboratives: A strategic response to shape the social work agenda. Social work, 41(6), 602-611.
  13. Ball, W. W. R., & Coxeter, H. S. (2022). Quantified System.
  14. Beiranvand, Y., & Mirzai, A. (2023). The Stylistic Analysis of Mulla Manochehr Kolivand's Book of Poetry. Journal of Kurdish Literature, 8(2), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2022(3-II)56
  15. Braathen, P. (2016). Paradox in organizations seen as social complex systems. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 18(2), 1-14.
  16. Bray, G. A. (2009). The obesity paradox—an artifact of small sample size?. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 6(9), 561562.
  17. Brooks, C. (1947). The language of paradox (pp. 28-39). na. ISBN 1-4051-0695- 6
  18. Da, N. Z. (2019). The computational case against computational literary studies. Critical inquiry, 45(3), 601-639. doi:10.5195/jffp.2019.849
  19. Ekman, J. (2016). Self-contradictory reasoning. Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics, 211-229.
  20. Elsässer, J. P. (2023). Sustainable development an oxymoron?.
  21. Głaz, A. (2023). Conceptual oxymoron, oxymetaphor, and oxymetaphtonymy: inclusive border and violent inclusion in close-up. Qeios. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.26.4.18
  22. Guillory, J. (2022). Literary study and the modern system of the disciplines. In Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siècle (pp. 19-43). Princeton University Press.
  23. Johnson, E. (2019). Is Structured Creativity an Oxymoron? The Effects of Moderate Task Structure on Virtual and Face to Face Team Creative Output.
  24. Keller, J., & Tian, P. (2021). The organizational paradox of language. In Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B (Vol. 73, pp. 101-122). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  25. Kellman, S. G. (2019). Literary translingualism: What and why?. Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 16(3), 337-346.
  26. Kinsella, J. (2022). Privilege, Property, Oppression. In Legibility: An Antifascist Poetics (pp. 25-34). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85742-4_4
  27. Larson, E. (1998). Reframing the meaning of disability to families: The embrace of paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 47(7), 865-875.
  28. MacKenzie, I. (2019). After Possession. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, 27(1), 81-99.
  29. McFarland, G. F. (1963). The early literary career of Julius Charles Hare. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 46(1), 42-83.
  30. Musaev, T., Aziz, J., & Mohd, J. (2021). Translation and Linguistic Strategies of English Oxymora into Japanese by Japanese Language Learners. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(4).
  31. Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: Resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition, 86(2), 157-199.
  32. Public Good. Education Sciences, 11(11), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110663