• +91-9555269393
  • info@ijdssh.com

International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities

(By Aryavart International University, India)

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN:2455-5142 | P-ISSN:2455-7730
Impact Factor(2020): 5.790 | Impact Factor(2021): 6.013

IJDSSH
Typically replies within an hour

IJDSSH
Hi there

How can I help you?
Chat with Us

Paper Details

ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES (ESP): THE MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Vol. 4, Jul-Dec 2017 | Page: 135-147

Dr. G. Ramamurthy
Associate Professor in English, Usha Rama College of Engineering and Technology, Telaprolu, Andhra Pradesh.

Received: 11-11-2017, Accepted: 02-12-2017, Published Online: 08-12-2017


. Download Full Paper

Abstract

The field of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) emerged roughly fifty years ago in response to rising pressures on schools and educators to cater to the individual needs of their students and to keep up with the rapidly evolving field of theoretical linguistics. Although it developed out of ELT, Applied Linguistics in the subject of TESOL is now recognised as its own distinct discipline. This paper will cover the origins, evolution, and status quo of ESP, and then anticipate the future directions of this vital field. Text-first and context-first approaches to discourse structure analysis are compared, as well as the theoretical, analytic, and methodological developments of ESP, the roles of genre analysis, target language use situation analysis, and context in ESP, and the 'just-in-case' EAP and 'just-in-time' EOP approaches are discussed. The paper predicts that ESP will adopt a wide-angled epistemological stance to survey the (a) discursive, (b) generic, (c) social, and (d) organisational structures of specialised texts and discourses, as well as those of texts and discourses simplified for the popularisation of science, in a systematic and contextualised manner. Practitioners of ESP are likewise cautioned against the perils of spreading knowledge of ESP's powerful genres.

Reference
  1. ALBERT P’RAYAN, (2008)” Engineering English: A Critical Evaluation”, Annamalai University.
  2. Antony, Omana. (2013) “Technology-Assisted Language Learning.” Role of ICT in English Language Teaching and Learning: Observations and Ruminations: 93-105. Print.
  3. B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen and E. Seymour (2010), Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students.
  4. Christe, NV (2012), An interpersonal skill learning taxonomy for program evaluators’, Journal of Public Affairs Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 739-756.
  5. Chang YY. (2010) English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan Int ESP J; 2:55-84.
  6. D. Rus, (2016) A Didactic Approach to Writing Skills in a Technical Learning Environment, Procedia Technology, 22 1191-1196.
  7. Dana Rus, (2015)” Developing Technical Writing Skills to Engineering Students”, Procedia Technology Volume 19, 2015, Pages 1109-1114.
  8. Evangeline, JCK and Ganesh. K, (2014) “Technical Writing – Redefining the English syllabus to meet the Growing Demand for competent Engineers”, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Volume 19, Issue 3, Ver. III, PP 27-31.
  9. Hashem Ahmed Alsamadani, (2012)” Needs Analysis in ESP Context: Saudi Engineering Students as a Case Study”, Advances in Language and Literary Studies.
  10. Huang, Y.-H. (2016) Examining the Usefulness of an ESP Textbook for Information Technology: Learner Perspectives. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 2798-2805.
  11. Hossain, J. (2013) ESP Needs Analysis for Engineering Students: A Learner Centered Approach. http://presidency.edu.bd/uploads/Article003.pdf.
  12. Kherfi, B & Gueziz, M. A. A (2016) Designing ESP course: Setting objectives for business leaners (Published Dissertation) (Faculty of Letters and Languages, Ouargla University).
  13. Lewis Norman, (2010) Speak Better Write Better English. Delhi: Goyal Publishers
  14. Marcela Díaz Ramírez, (2014)” The Impact of Project Work and the Writing Process Method on Writing Production”, SciELO Analytics.
  15. Özgür Şahana, Mustafa Çobanb, Ece Zehir Topkayac, (2014)” A Language Needs Analysis of Engineering Undergraduate Students at a Technical University: A Multidimensional Approach”, ELT Dept., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.
  16. Piyatida Changpueng and Fasawang Pattanapichet, (2015)” An Analysis of English in the Workplace: The Needs of Engineers in Writing in English”, Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts Vol.15(3): 151-176.
  17. Soraya Rajabi and Saeed Ketabi, (2012) “Enhancing Students ‘Use of Cohesive Devices: Impacts of PowerPoint Presentations on EFL Academic Writing”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 1135-1143.
  18. Terry Fellner, (2011)” Developing an ESP Presentation Course for Graduate Students of Science and Engineering”, Center for Research and Development in Higher Education Saga University.
  19. T. Dudley-Evans, M.J John, Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (1998), 4-5, 171-173.
  20. Tatiana Nekrasova Beker Anthony Becker Angela Sharpe, (2012)” Identifying and teaching target vocabulary in an ESP course”, TESOL International Association.
  21. W. Crombie, E.S.P. (1991): Fact or Fiction? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, Alicante, 4 25-36.
  22. Wanyi, Liu., Taogang, Liu., Sumin, Yang. (2011) “Computer Assisted Language Learning. E-business and E-Government, (ICEE).” IEEE Conference Publication.: 1-4. Web. 5 June.
  23. Zygmunt, T. (2016). Language education for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education,7(1),112-124.