Abstract
Semantics is the study of meaning involved in human language. To clearly demonstrate the relationship
between semantics and language, we can picture it out like transportation. In this context, language is the
vehicle that carries the semantics (meaning, thoughts and ideas) to the hearer. However, unlike the
components of language (i.e.syntax, phonemes etc), semantics are abstract and is more closely related to
one’s logical and cognitive experience. Considering this peculiar nature of semantics, various theories were
developed in the purpose of determining how such “meanings” are derived. Because of the complexity, the
study of semantics does not only limit on the linguistic field alone but encompasses other fields such as
philosophy, physiology, neurology and even statistics. In this study, the theories involved in semantics are
investigated and how each theory, although seems valid, yet were deficient to explain the true origin and
nature of meanings. The theories are generally subdivided into two main categories: the conceptual and
referential theories. The conceptual theory focuses primarily on the cognitive representations o f meaning. On
the other hand, referential theory defines meaning as reference to facts or objects that can be observed in the
outside world. Furthermore, this paper also explores the evidences in meanings and how the process is
explained in scientifically and empirical way
Reference
- Allan Keith. 2016. A History of Semantics. In N. Riemer (Ed). The Routledge Handbook of Semantics. Routledge, Abindon Oxon UK. pp. 48-68
- Bagha, Karim N. 2011. A Short Introduction to Semantics. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2(6). pp. 1411-1419
- Bar-on, Dorit. 2002. Semantic Verificationism, Linguistic Behaviorism and Translation. Philosophical Studies. 66. pp. 235-259
- Chitsaz M and Hodjati, Seyyed Mohammad A. 2012. Conceptualization in Ideational Theory of Meaning: Cognitive Theories and Semantic Modeling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 32. pp. 450-455
- Garrod, Simmon and Daneman, Merydeth. 2003. Reading, Psychology of. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228050841_Reading_Psychology_of. Accessed on April 2019
- Holm, P and Karlgren, K. 1995. Theories of Meaning and Different Perspectives on Information Systems. In Proceedings of ISCO 3- International Conference on Information System Concepts – Towards a Consolidation of Views. Marburg.
- Kremmer, David. 2014. Neurolinguistics: Mind, Brain and Language. Researchgate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262284156_Neurolinguistics_Mind_brain_and_language.. Accessed on April 2019
- Kreidler, Charles W. 2002. Introducing English Semantics. Routledge London and New York
- Krifka, Manfred. 2011. Varieties of Semantic Evidence. An International Handbook. (Maienborn et al., eds.). Volume 1
- Locke, J. 1996. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Mwihaki, Alice. 2004. Meaning as Use: A Functional View of Semantics and Pragmatics. Swahili Forum 11. pp. 127- 139
- Paducheva, Elena. 1991.Semantic Features and Selection Restrictions. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Moscow. pp. 194-197
- Speaks, Jeff. 2018. Theories of Meaning. The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL
- Weinrich, U. 1996. Explorations in Semantics Theory. In T.A. Sebeok (ed). Current Trends in Linguistics, III. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 395-477
Issa Safaa Issa Al Khalidi
English Department Collage of Basic Education University Of Misan
Received: 09-08-2020, Accepted: 16-09-2020, Published Online: 28-09-2020