• +91-9555269393
  • info@ijdssh.com

International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities

(By Aryavart International University, India)

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal

E-ISSN:2455-5142 | P-ISSN:2455-7730
Impact Factor(2021): 6.013 | Impact Factor(2022): 6.725
Search

IJDSSH
Typically replies within an hour

IJDSSH
Hi there

How can I help you?
Chat with Us

Paper Details

Cognitive Developments, Geographical Models and Theories

Vol. 11, Jan-Jun 2021 | Page: 22-44

Dr. Mohammadhossein Ramesht
Isfahan University, Department of Geography, Geomorphology Speciality

Azhar Abbas Sabr
Isfahan University, Department of Geography, Geomorphology Speciality

Kamal Mohammed Ayyash
Isfahan University, Department of Geography, Geomorphology Speciality

Received: 17-05-2021, Accepted: 12-06-2021, Published Online: 13-06-2021


. Download Full Paper

Abstract

Theories and models in geography are an expression of a new conception or understanding of a phenomenon or process that geographers attempt to gain the attention of others by suggesting conceptual metaphors[2]. The theory can be understood simply as understanding something else that the researcher is trying to express in words that can have the closest meaning to his discoveries such as "the butterfly effect expressing an objective truth in the communication system". The theory of atmospheric phenomena must be considered an abstract concept of tangible things and in the realm of perception of the human mind and a question of nature the theories and models are always supported by a knowledge base so that the theory cannot exist and has been found to have no epistemological roots so when classifying geographical theories it appears from It is necessary to design cognitive systems first because the foundation of any theory is supported by the conceptual system of its cognitive system. Epistemology has seen both “scientific” and “spatial” and geography has recently seen the introduction of many theories into the cognitive system. The importance of theories lies more in the schemas that organize the researcher's belief and of course the researcher's belief in facts. They differ objectively scientifically Darwin, for example, derived from biology data for his mental schema and beliefs, called evolution proposed by biologist Bertlinvi, from the same data that Darwin studied, another mental schema and belief, called general systems theory. All these differences are due to the cognitive system that affects the researcher's knowledge or instinct, and in this system the researcher's beliefs and mental plans are formed.

Reference
  1. Entezari, Mojgan, (2014), Stellar Climate, Geography and Environmental Planning, University of Isfahan, Volume 25, Number 1, pp. 10-1.
  2. Babajmali, Farhad, (2014), Allometry of Ice Production and Spatial Identity of Central Iran Habitats, Geography and Environmental Planning, University of Isfahan, Volume 25, Number 1, pp. 11-24.
  3. Babajmali, Farhad, (2012), Components of Geomorphology and Its Effects on Civic Identity, Case Study: Mental Civilization and NonMental Civilization in Central Iran, PhD Thesis, University of Isfahan.
  4. Bertalenfi, Ludwigfon (1374,) Fundamentals, Evolution and Applications of General Systems Theory, translated by Kiomars Pariani. Tehran
  5. Papli Yazdi, Mohammad Hossein; Majid Labaf Khaniki (2001), 'Hermeneutics and InterpretiveCognitive Research Critique of Classical Empirical Methods in Humanities Research, Geographical Research, No. 61, pp. 6-20.
  6. Papli Yazdi, Mohammad Hossein (1382). Ideologies governing the geography of Iran, Geographical Research, No. 71, pp. 35-5.
  7. Jamshidi, Mahmoud, (2003), Considerations on the Theory of Spatial Arrangement Analysis, Art and Architecture Urban Studies, No. 6, 25- 20
  8. Javan, Jafar, Sadeghi, Mojtaba, Rahnama, Mohammad Rahim, (2016), What is the methodology of recognizing geographical space? (Delay on the nature of the methodology of recognizing geographical space from the perspective of hermeneutic phenomenology), Quarterly Journal of Geographical Studies of Arid Areas, 25, Hakim Sabzevari University, pp. 17-36
  9. Ramesht, Mohammad Hossein, (2001), Lakes of the fourth period of crystallization and expansion of civilization in Iran, Geographical Research, Volume 16, Number 60, pp. 111-90
  10. Mahmoudi, Tayebeh, Entezari, Mojgan, Vali, Abbas Ali, Rabbani, Ali, (2016) Spatial identity and its role in the crystallization of Iran's civil nucleus, Quantitative Geomorphological Research, No. 4, 16, pp. 71-65
  11. Rahedan Monfared, Mohammad (2016), Geographical system of Iran, monograph of the center of Iranian Islamic model of progress, Tehran.
  12. Salgi, Leila, Zanganeh Asadi, Mohammad Ali, Mohammadian, Ebrat, (1398), Phenomenology in Geomorphology, Geography and Development, Sistan University, No. 54, pp. 14-1.
  13. Shateri, Mofid (2012), Social Darwinism and its effect on geography, Sepehr Magazine, Volume 21, Number 83, pp. 44-42
  14. Shokouei, Hossein (2003), Environmental Philosophies and Geographical Schools. Volume II. Gita Studies Publications. 8
  15. Shokouei, Hossein (1382). New ideas in the philosophy of geography; Environmental Philosophies and Geographical Schools, Volume 2, Edition 1, Tehran, Gitashenasi Publications.
  16. Farid, Yadaleh, (1987), The course of thought in the realm of human geography, second edition, Tabriz, Tabriz University Press, p. 384.
  17. Goli Mokhtari, Leila, 2012, Allometry in Geomorphology, PhD Thesis, Supervisor Dr. Mohammad Hossein Ramesht, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning.
  18. Mahmoudi, Tayebeh, (2014), The Identity of Iran's Civil Core Mirrors, Geography and Environmental Planning, University of Isfahan, Volume 25, Number 1, pp. 90-79.
  19. Mahmoudi, Tayebeh, (1399), Phenomenal Geomorphology, Papli Publications, p.138.
  20. Nemat Elahi, Fatemeh, (2014,) Transtextual space in geomorphology, geography and environmental planning, University of Isfahan, Volume 25, Number 1, pp. 120–109
  21. Nojavan, Mohammad Reza, (1396), Zagros and Spatial Identity, Geography and Environmental Planning, No. 4, consecutive.68.
  22. Vasegh, Mahmoud, Ahad Mohammadi and Javad Heshmati, (1398) A Study and Critique of the Epistemological Foundations of the School of Phenomenology with Emphasis on Geography, Human Geography Research, Volume 51, Number 2, pp. 492-471.
  23. Haggett, Peter, (1375), New Combined Geography, translated by Shapur Goodarzinjad, Samat Publications
  24. Chorley, Richard J. (1962). Geomorphology and General Systems Theory, United States Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C.-Claval, P. (1977).La nouvelle géographie.
  25. FeniXX.-Davis, W. M. (1899). The geographical cycle.The Geographical Journal,14(5), 481-504
  26. Gilbert, C. G., & Dutton, C. E. (1880).Report on the Geology of the Henry Mountains. US Government Printing Office
  27. Hack, J. T. (1975). Dynamic equilibrium and landscape evolution.Theories of landform development,1, 87-102.
  28. Heidegger, Martin (1988). Being and Time, translated by John Macqurrie & Edward Robinson, Oxford
  29. Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture, Space Syntax. P 380
  30. Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984), The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  31. Johnston.R.J.(1986) Philosophy and human geography
  32. Kennedy, B. A. (1992). Hutton to Horton: views of sequence, progression and equilibrium in geomorphology.Geomorphology,5(3- 5), 231-250.
  33. Relph, E. (1970). An inquiry into the relations between phenomenology and geography.Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien,14(3), 193-201
  34. Spirn, A. W. (1947).The language of landscape. Yale University Press.- Strahler, A. N. (1952). Dynamicbasis of geomorphology.Geological society of america bulletin,63(9), 923-938.
  35. Summerfield, M. A., & Brown, R. W. (1998). Geomorphic factors in the interpretation of fission-track data. InAdvances in fission-track geochronology(pp. 269-284). Springer, Dordrecht .